Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-9050

Wireshark build support enhancement

Details

    • Improvement
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Minor
    • None
    • None
    • 3
    • 0.95
    • 7739
    • DCO-2016_Dec12_Dec25, DCO-2016_Dec26-Jan8, DCO-2016_Jan9-Jan22, DCO-2017_Jan23-Feb5

    Description

      The latest version of change http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/5520/
      make it cumbersome for users to configure the build environment  when simply running builds without packaging support (i.e make -f Makefile ).

      The Makefile, README and wsconfig.sh should be aligned with the concept http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/5520/ . Users should have to edit a single environment variable in file wsconfig.sh only to build with make command only.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          is related to

          Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. LU-6353 Push Wireshark Support Upstream

          • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Resolved

          Activity

            [LU-9050] Wireshark build support enhancement
            utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment -

            I've pushed the lustre wireshark plugins upstream, so that they won't live in our repo any longer. See LU-6353

            utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - I've pushed the lustre wireshark plugins upstream, so that they won't live in our repo any longer. See LU-6353
            tgeerdes Trent Geerdes (Inactive) added a comment -

            Yes, I'd try including ubuntu in wsconfig.sh. Create your branch from the master branch of the lustre-release repo when creating the review.

            tgeerdes Trent Geerdes (Inactive) added a comment - Yes, I'd try including ubuntu in wsconfig.sh. Create your branch from the master branch of the lustre-release repo when creating the review.
            tarebax Thomas AX Areba (Inactive) added a comment -

            Since we now have ubuntu builder, shouldn't we update wsconfig.sh to include ubuntu? or should we stop building it altogether since it's (wireshark) included in b_ieel as per Frank's?

            tarebax Thomas AX Areba (Inactive) added a comment - Since we now have ubuntu builder, shouldn't we update wsconfig.sh to include ubuntu? or should we stop building it altogether since it's (wireshark) included in b_ieel as per Frank's?
            tgeerdes Trent Geerdes (Inactive) added a comment -

            We currently have ubuntu in the builder list and after http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/22074/ what actions does DCO need to take for wireshark build support?

            tgeerdes Trent Geerdes (Inactive) added a comment - We currently have ubuntu in the builder list and after http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/22074/ what actions does DCO need to take for wireshark build support?
            jlevi Jodi Levi (Inactive) added a comment -

            Reopening into TEI backlog

            jlevi Jodi Levi (Inactive) added a comment - Reopening into TEI backlog
            agarcia Andrea Garcia (Inactive) added a comment -

            This is a more general ticket for wireshark support. Putting as low priority until we get time to address

            agarcia Andrea Garcia (Inactive) added a comment - This is a more general ticket for wireshark support. Putting as low priority until we get time to address

            People

              tarebax Thomas AX Areba (Inactive)
              jlevi Jodi Levi (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: