Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-11993

lustre-rsync-test test_2c: remove from target yields rc=-2

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Minor
    • None
    • Lustre 2.12.1, Lustre 2.14.0
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark <nclark@whamcloud.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f7fd52b8-1a2c-11e9-a2cc-52540065bddc

      test_2c failed with the following error:

      Failure in replication; differences found.
      

      Multiple occurences of unlink failing on targets:

      ***** Start 2057 UNLNK (6) [0x2000088d1:0x1ca:0x0] [0x2000088d1:0x113:0x0] RESULTS.XLS *****
      remove: /tmp/target/.lustrerepl/[0x2000088d1:0x1ca:0x0]; rc=-2, errno=2
      remove: /tmp/target/d2c.lustre-rsync-test/clients/client1/~dmtmp/EXCEL/RESULTS.XLS; rc1=-2, errno=2
      remove: /tmp/target2/.lustrerepl/[0x2000088d1:0x1ca:0x0]; rc=-2, errno=2
      remove: /tmp/target2/d2c.lustre-rsync-test/clients/client1/~dmtmp/EXCEL/RESULTS.XLS; rc1=-2, errno=2
      ##### End 2057 UNLNK (6) [0x2000088d1:0x1ca:0x0] [0x2000088d1:0x113:0x0] RESULTS.XLS rc=-2 #####
      

      Might this be a DCO issue?

      VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV
      lustre-rsync-test test_2c - Failure in replication; differences found.

      Attachments

        Activity

          [LU-11993] lustre-rsync-test test_2c: remove from target yields rc=-2
          hornc Chris Horn added a comment - +1 on master https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/047c442e-171d-42c1-8f44-196618efbf45
          artem_blagodarenko Artem Blagodarenko (Inactive) added a comment - It looks like this happened again https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/8ed1d74a-6e16-4ac2-928f-d636f5f4a49e
          lixi_wc Li Xi added a comment -

          Is there any real usage of lustre_rsync anywhere by anybody? If not, I am wondering whether removing the tool is proper. That would save a lot of maintaining effort for sure.

          If we look for recent tickets related to lustre_rsync. Most of them (LU-11479 LU-11233 LU-10989 LU-10978 LU-10508 LU-10515) are test failures and compilation failures, zero actually usage problem. That implies we spend a lot of effort to maintain it without any benefit.

          One value of lustre_rsync is using it as a test case of Changelog. But we could use the same effort to improve Changelog specific test codes and that would be more efficient.

          lixi_wc Li Xi added a comment - Is there any real usage of lustre_rsync anywhere by anybody? If not, I am wondering whether removing the tool is proper. That would save a lot of maintaining effort for sure. If we look for recent tickets related to lustre_rsync. Most of them ( LU-11479 LU-11233 LU-10989 LU-10978 LU-10508 LU-10515 ) are test failures and compilation failures, zero actually usage problem. That implies we spend a lot of effort to maintain it without any benefit. One value of lustre_rsync is using it as a test case of Changelog. But we could use the same effort to improve Changelog specific test codes and that would be more efficient.
          lixi_wc Li Xi added a comment -

          Another similar but not the same one:

          Error: 'Failure in replication; differences found.'

          https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50757dfa-cb38-11e9-97d5-52540065bddc

          lixi_wc Li Xi added a comment - Another similar but not the same one: Error: 'Failure in replication; differences found.' https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50757dfa-cb38-11e9-97d5-52540065bddc

          +1 on master https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50757dfa-cb38-11e9-97d5-52540065bddc along with 13 others in the past 4 weeks.

          adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - +1 on master https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50757dfa-cb38-11e9-97d5-52540065bddc along with 13 others in the past 4 weeks.

          People

            wc-triage WC Triage
            maloo Maloo
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: