Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-17000

Coverity static analysis issues

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Improvement Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • None
    • None
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

      I've been experimenting with more static analyzers (Coverity in this case). While it does have some false positives, it looks like it found a number of legitimate bugs. See https://scan.coverity.com/projects/lustre for details.

      It's seems like Coverity has been used with Lustre in the past (see: https://wiki.lustre.org/images/8/8a/LUG2013-Lustre_Static_Code_Analysis-Bull.pdf). Although, it doesn't seem like it's been run in a while.

      Also, there's a number of Coverity comments that seem out-dated and should probably just be cleaned up.

            timday Tim Day
            timday Tim Day
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            9 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: