Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-17000

Coverity static analysis issues

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Minor
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      I've been experimenting with more static analyzers (Coverity in this case). While it does have some false positives, it looks like it found a number of legitimate bugs. See https://scan.coverity.com/projects/lustre for details.

      It's seems like Coverity has been used with Lustre in the past (see: https://wiki.lustre.org/images/8/8a/LUG2013-Lustre_Static_Code_Analysis-Bull.pdf). Although, it doesn't seem like it's been run in a while.

      Also, there's a number of Coverity comments that seem out-dated and should probably just be cleaned up.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              timday Tim Day
              timday Tim Day
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated: